F&SCM versus Business Central: the Differences between Microsoft’s Two ERPs

Dynamics 365 ERP - General

The article compares Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain (F&SCM) with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, highlighting their functionality differences and licensing costs.
F&SCM offers deeper functionalities and native applications, such as human resources and transportation management modules, which are only available as third-party applications on Business Central.
F&SCM is more suitable for larger companies and costs approximately 60-80% more than Business Central for full users. F&SCM also requires a minimum of 20 full users, while Business Central does not have any minimum requirement.
The implementation cost of F&SCM is higher than that of Business Central. The extra expense of implementing F&SCM may be justified if a business requires its deep functionality, but if not, it is not worth spending the extra money.
Business Central has a shorter implementation timeline of approximately 3-6 months, while F&SCM takes closer to 8 months to a year.
Logan Consulting specializes in the implementation of both F&SCM and Business Central and believes that both solutions are excellent ERPs for companies to improve their business processes.
Logan Consulting emphasizes the importance of finding the best suited ERP solution for a business and offers assistance and support throughout the implementation process.
Readers are encouraged to contact Logan Consulting to speak to an expert and discuss their next steps in implementing an ERP solution.

Registered users can view the full text for FREE!